Intel Iris Xe vs Intel Arc A350M

Compare Intel Iris Xe vs Intel Arc A350M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

974 points

1817 points

86% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

24 FPS

47 FPS

23 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

14 FPS

32 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

15 FPS

31 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

21 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Xe and the Arc A350M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

100.90 points

377.40 points

274% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

14184 points

23107 points

62% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11957 points

24875 points

108% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16575 points

24781 points

49% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

Identical

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1100 MHz

1150 MHz

4% slightly higher boost clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

66% significantly lower TDP

25 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

13.2 Gigapixels/s

27.6 Gigapixels/s

109% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

26.4 Gigatexels/s

55.2 Gigatexels/s

109% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

8.45 TFLOPS

378% significantly better floating point performance

1.77 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

768

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

267th of 586

220th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 September

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Iris Xe vs Arc A350M benchmarks

For gaming, the Arc A350M graphics card is better than the Iris Xe in our tests.

Our database shows that both the Iris Xe and Arc A350M both have the same core clock speed. Despite this, the Arc A350M has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Iris Xe has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Arc A350M at 25 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Arc A350M is faster than the Iris Xe.