Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

Identical

185 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

Identical

5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the Radeon R5 M330? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

5430 points

6% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

5844 points

19% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

4573 points

20% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

955 MHz

377% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1150 MHz

11% slightly higher boost clock speed

1030 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

18 W

150% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

8.24 Gigapixels/s

79% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

123% significantly higher texture rate

20.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

Identical

320

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

437th of 586

443rd of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R5 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

Iris Pro 5200 vs Radeon R5 M330 benchmarks

For gaming, the Radeon R5 M330 graphics card is better than the Iris Pro 5200 in our tests.

The Radeon R5 M330 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Radeon R5 M330 has a significantly lower TDP at 18 W when compared to the Iris Pro 5200 at 45 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Radeon R5 M330 is faster than the Iris Pro 5200.