Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

278 points

50% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

6 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the Quadro K2100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

61% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3163 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

6% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4627 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

4355 points

14% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

654 MHz

227% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

22% slightly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

8.00 Gigapixels/s

73% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

43% significantly higher texture rate

32.02 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

576

79% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

20% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

441st of 586

390th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Iris Pro 5200 vs Quadro K2100M benchmarks

For gaming, the Iris Pro 5200 graphics card is better than the Quadro K2100M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Quadro K2100M at 55 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Iris Pro 5200 is better than the Quadro K2100M.