Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

250 points

35% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

6 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the Quadro K2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

25% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

20% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

4126 points

8% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

954 MHz

376% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

13% slightly lower TDP

51 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

7.63 Gigapixels/s

65% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

50% significantly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

384

20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

441st of 586

399th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Iris Pro 5200 vs Quadro K2000 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Iris Pro 5200 beats the Quadro K2000 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Quadro K2000 at 51 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Iris Pro 5200 over the Quadro K2000.