Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

278 points

198% significantly better overall score

93 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

2 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

1 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the Quadro K1000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

221% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

1590 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

181% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

1743 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

151% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

1509 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

850 MHz

325% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

Identical

45 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

35% slightly higher pixel rate

3.4 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

238% significantly higher texture rate

13.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

66% significantly more shading units

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

150% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

400th of 599

520th of 599

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Iris Pro 5200 vs Quadro K1000M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Iris Pro 5200 GPU is faster than the Quadro K1000M in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K1000M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, both the Iris Pro 5200 and the Quadro K1000M have an identical TDP. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Iris Pro 5200 is faster than the Quadro K1000M.