Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs Intel Iris Xe

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs Intel Iris Xe, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

974 points

426% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

24 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

14 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

15 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

10 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the Iris Xe? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

14184 points

177% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

11957 points

143% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

16575 points

337% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

300 MHz

49% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1150 MHz

4% slightly higher boost clock speed

1100 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

15 W

200% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

13.2 Gigapixels/s

186% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

74% significantly higher texture rate

26.4 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

384

20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

66% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

200% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

440th of 586

267th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 September

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.6

Iris Pro 5200 vs Iris Xe comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Iris Xe GPU is faster than the Iris Pro 5200 in gaming.

Our database shows that the Iris Xe has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Iris Xe has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Iris Pro 5200 at 45 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Iris Xe is better than the Iris Pro 5200.