Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

260 points

40% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

7 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the GeForce GT 750M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

160% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

1958 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

14% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4272 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

4078 points

7% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

941 MHz

370% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1150 MHz

18% slightly higher boost clock speed

967 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

11% slightly lower TDP

50 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

7.74 Gigapixels/s

68% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

48% significantly higher texture rate

30.94 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

384

20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

451st of 597

403rd of 597

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.6

Iris Pro 5200 vs GeForce GT 750M comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GT 750M beats the Iris Pro 5200 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GT 750M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the GeForce GT 750M at 50 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GT 750M is better than the Iris Pro 5200.