Intel Iris Plus 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Compare Intel Iris Plus 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

278 points

380 points

36% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS

9 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

5 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS

6 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 655 and the Quadro K4100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

6879 points

39% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

4915 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7413 points

42% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5215 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8124 points

15% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

7058 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

8474 points

23% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

6839 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7380 points

9002 points

21% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

706 MHz

135% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

566% significantly lower TDP

100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.3 Gigapixels/s

16.94 Gigapixels/s

168% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

50.4 Gigatexels/s

67.78 Gigatexels/s

34% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

1152

200% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

394th of 597

365th of 597

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2018 April

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Iris Plus 655 vs Quadro K4100M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K4100M GPU is faster than the Iris Plus 655 in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K4100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Iris Plus 655 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K4100M at 100 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K4100M is faster than the Iris Plus 655.