Intel Iris Plus 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Compare Intel Iris Plus 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

278 points

Identical

278 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 655 and the Quadro K2100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

6879 points

190% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

2369 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7413 points

134% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3163 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8124 points

122% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

3644 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

8474 points

146% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

3440 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7380 points

59% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4627 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8354 points

91% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4355 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

654 MHz

118% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

266% significantly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.3 Gigapixels/s

8.00 Gigapixels/s

27% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

50.4 Gigatexels/s

57% significantly higher texture rate

32.02 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

576

49% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

390th of 586

388th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2018 April

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Iris Plus 655 vs Quadro K2100M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K2100M beats the Iris Plus 655 in gaming performance.

The Quadro K2100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Iris Plus 655 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K2100M at 55 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K2100M is faster than the Iris Plus 655.