Intel Iris Plus 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Compare Intel Iris Plus 655 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

278 points

11% slightly better overall score

250 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 655 and the Quadro K2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

6879 points

236% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

2044 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7413 points

82% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8124 points

118% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

3710 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

8474 points

128% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

3713 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7380 points

81% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8354 points

102% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4126 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

954 MHz

218% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

239% significantly lower TDP

51 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.3 Gigapixels/s

7.63 Gigapixels/s

21% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

50.4 Gigatexels/s

65% significantly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

390th of 586

399th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2018 April

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Iris Plus 655 vs Quadro K2000 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K2000 beats the Iris Plus 655 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Iris Plus 655 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K2000 at 51 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K2000 over the Iris Plus 655.