Intel Iris Plus 650 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Compare Intel Iris Plus 650 0 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

334 points

28% slightly better overall score

260 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

8 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

6 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 650 and the Quadro K2000D? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7106 points

97% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3602 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7087 points

80% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3916 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

954 MHz

218% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

0.5 GiB

2 GiB

300% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

239% significantly lower TDP

51 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.9 Gigapixels/s

7.63 Gigapixels/s

10% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

55.2 Gigatexels/s

80% significantly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

365th of 588

399th of 588

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 January

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Iris Plus 650 vs Quadro K2000D benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Iris Plus 650 beats the Quadro K2000D in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2000D has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro K2000D has significantly more memory with 2 GiB of memory compared to 0.5 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Iris Plus 650 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K2000D at 51 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Iris Plus 650 is faster than the Quadro K2000D.