Intel Iris Plus 640 vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Compare Intel Iris Plus 640 0 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 350, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

287 points
297 points
3% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

9 FPS
2 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS
Identical
4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

7 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
6 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS
Identical
2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 640 and the Radeon R7 350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6601 points
10951 points
65% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6827 points
9660 points
41% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6639 points
9524 points
43% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6920 points
7976 points
15% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz
1000 MHz
233% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1100 MHz
4% slightly higher boost clock speed
1050 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W
266% significantly lower TDP
55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.6 Gigapixels/s
12.8 Gigapixels/s
93% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

52.8 Gigatexels/s
106% significantly higher texture rate
25.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384
512
33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

48
49% significantly more texture mapping units
32

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

6
16
166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

385th of 586
377th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 January
2016 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4
4.6

Iris Plus 640 vs Radeon R7 350 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Iris Plus 640 GPU is faster than the Radeon R7 350 in gaming.

Our database shows that the Radeon R7 350 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Iris Plus 640 has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Iris Plus 640 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Radeon R7 350 at 55 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Iris Plus 640 is better than the Radeon R7 350.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons