Intel Iris Plus 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Compare Intel Iris Plus 640 0 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000 3 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

306 points

427 points

39% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

10 FPS

11 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

5 FPS

6 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS

68 FPS

63 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

5 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 640 and the Quadro K4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

6247 points

74% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

3574 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6601 points

6816 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6827 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

6504 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7862 points

88% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

4166 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6639 points

6816 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6920 points

0.64% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

6876 points

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

0.5 GiB

3 GiB

499% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

433% significantly lower TDP

80 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.6 Gigapixels/s

12.96 Gigapixels/s

96% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

52.8 Gigatexels/s

1% slightly higher texture rate

51.84 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

768

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

378th of 593

352nd of 593

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 January

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Iris Plus 640 vs Quadro K4000 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K4000 beats the Iris Plus 640 in gaming performance.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro K4000 has significantly more memory with 3 GiB of memory compared to 0.5 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Iris Plus 640 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K4000 at 80 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K4000 is faster than the Iris Plus 640.