Intel Iris Plus 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Compare Intel Iris Plus 640 0 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

287 points

3% slightly better overall score

278 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

9 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

7 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 640 and the Quadro K3100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

6247 points

105% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

3037 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6601 points

87% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3517 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6827 points

46% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4645 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7862 points

110% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

3739 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6639 points

6% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

6238 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6920 points

104% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3389 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

680 MHz

126% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

0.5 GiB

4 GiB

700% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

400% significantly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.6 Gigapixels/s

11.3 Gigapixels/s

71% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

52.8 Gigatexels/s

16% slightly higher texture rate

45.18 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

768

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

384th of 586

388th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 January

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Iris Plus 640 vs Quadro K3100M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Iris Plus 640 beats the Quadro K3100M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro K3100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro K3100M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 0.5 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Iris Plus 640 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K3100M at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Iris Plus 640 is faster than the Quadro K3100M.