Intel Iris 6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Compare Intel Iris 6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

223 points

250 points

12% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

Identical

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris 6100 and the Quadro K2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

4919 points

140% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

2044 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3575 points

4071 points

13% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4075 points

9% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

3710 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

5463 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

3713 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3026 points

4071 points

34% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4499 points

9% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4126 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

954 MHz

218% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

239% significantly lower TDP

51 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6 Gigapixels/s

7.63 Gigapixels/s

27% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

48 Gigatexels/s

57% significantly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

411th of 586

400th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Iris 6100 vs Quadro K2000 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K2000 beats the Iris 6100 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Iris 6100 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K2000 at 51 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K2000 is better than the Iris 6100.