Intel Iris 550 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Compare Intel Iris 550 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

287 points

3% slightly better overall score

278 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

5 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris 550 and the Quadro K3100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

5855 points

92% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

3037 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6574 points

86% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3517 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

7277 points

56% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4645 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7413 points

98% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

3739 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6869 points

10% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

6238 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6580 points

94% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3389 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

680 MHz

126% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

400% significantly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6 Gigapixels/s

11.3 Gigapixels/s

88% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

48 Gigatexels/s

6% slightly higher texture rate

45.18 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

768

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

382nd of 586

387th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Iris 550 vs Quadro K3100M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Iris 550 GPU is faster than the Quadro K3100M in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K3100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Iris 550 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K3100M at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Iris 550 is faster than the Quadro K3100M.