Intel Iris 540 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Compare Intel Iris 540 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

213 points
278 points
30% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS
4 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS
3 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris 540 and the Quadro K2100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

6079 points
156% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score
2369 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6252 points
97% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
3163 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6697 points
83% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
3644 points
Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7143 points
107% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score
3440 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6277 points
35% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
4627 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6234 points
43% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
4355 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz
654 MHz
118% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W
266% significantly lower TDP
55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6 Gigapixels/s
8.00 Gigapixels/s
33% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

48 Gigatexels/s
49% significantly higher texture rate
32.02 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384
576
49% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

48
Identical
48

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

6
16
166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

418th of 586
390th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

Iris 540 vs Quadro K2100M comparison

In our benchmarks, the Iris 540 beats the Quadro K2100M in gaming performance.

The Quadro K2100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Iris 540 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K2100M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Iris 540 is better than the Quadro K2100M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons