Intel Iris 540 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Compare Intel Iris 540 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

213 points

260 points

22% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

5 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

3 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris 540 and the Quadro K2000D? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6252 points

73% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3602 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6277 points

60% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3916 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

954 MHz

218% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

239% significantly lower TDP

51 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6 Gigapixels/s

7.63 Gigapixels/s

27% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

48 Gigatexels/s

57% significantly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

426th of 586

397th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Iris 540 vs Quadro K2000D benchmarks

For gaming, the Iris 540 graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000D in our tests.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2000D has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Iris 540 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K2000D at 51 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Iris 540 over the Quadro K2000D.