Intel HD 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Compare Intel HD 620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

167 points

79% significantly better overall score

93 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

2 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

1 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

Identical

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the HD 620 and the Quadro K1000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4496 points

182% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

1590 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4551 points

201% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

1509 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4185 points

140% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

1743 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4718 points

212% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

1509 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

850 MHz

183% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

200% significantly lower TDP

45 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

3 Gigapixels/s

3.4 Gigapixels/s

13% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

24 Gigatexels/s

76% significantly higher texture rate

13.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

192

Identical

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

460th of 586

506th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 August

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

HD 620 vs Quadro K1000M comparison

In our benchmarks, the HD 620 beats the Quadro K1000M in gaming performance.

The Quadro K1000M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the HD 620 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K1000M at 45 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the HD 620 is better than the Quadro K1000M.