Intel HD 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Compare Intel HD 615 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M 1 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

139 points
25% slightly better overall score
111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

3 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
3 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS
0 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS
Identical
1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the HD 615 and the Quadro K610M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

3518 points
197% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score
1181 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3612 points
97% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
1833 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3848 points
106% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
1867 points
Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

4368 points
279% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score
1150 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3043 points
52% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
1997 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3494 points
87% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
1867 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz
980 MHz
226% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

5 W
499% significantly lower TDP
30 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

2.55 Gigapixels/s
3.92 Gigapixels/s
53% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

20.4 Gigatexels/s
30% slightly higher texture rate
15.68 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

192
Identical
192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

24
49% significantly more texture mapping units
16

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

3
8
166% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

479th of 586
493rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 August
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

HD 615 vs Quadro K610M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the HD 615 beats the Quadro K610M in gaming performance.

The Quadro K610M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the HD 615 has a significantly lower TDP at 5 W when compared to the Quadro K610M at 30 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the HD 615 over the Quadro K610M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons