Intel HD 530 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Compare Intel HD 530 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

528 points
853 points
61% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

43 FPS
23 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
20 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

3 FPS
13 FPS
10 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

3 FPS
13 FPS
10 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

55 FPS
45 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
11 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the HD 530 and the Quadro P1000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4602 points
15667 points
240% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4874 points
14310 points
193% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4413 points
14517 points
228% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4937 points
13469 points
172% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

350 MHz
1354 MHz
286% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

950 MHz
1480 MHz
55% significantly higher boost clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W
213% significantly lower TDP
47 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

2.85 Gigapixels/s
47.36 Gigapixels/s
1561% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

22.8 Gigatexels/s
59.2 Gigatexels/s
159% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

192
640
233% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

24
40
66% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

3
32
966% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

322nd of 586
272nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4
4.5

HD 530 vs Quadro P1000 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Quadro P1000 beats the HD 530 in gaming performance.

The Quadro P1000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro P1000 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the HD 530 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro P1000 at 47 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P1000 is faster than the HD 530.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons