NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 vs Intel Arc A350M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Intel Arc A350M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3468 points

90% significantly better overall score

1817 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

82 FPS

36 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

47 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

41 FPS

9 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

32 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

59 FPS

28 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

31 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

31 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

21 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce RTX 3050 and the Arc A350M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

1484.67 points

293% significantly higher Blender score

377.40 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

71667 points

210% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

23107 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

63483 points

155% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

24875 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62406 points

151% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

24781 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1552 MHz

417% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1777 MHz

54% significantly higher boost clock speed

1150 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

224 GB/s

100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

130 W

25 W

420% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

56.86 Gigapixels/s

106% significantly higher pixel rate

27.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

142.2 Gigatexels/s

157% significantly higher texture rate

55.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

9.10 TFLOPS

415% significantly better floating point performance

1.77 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2560

233% significantly more shading units

768

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

66% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

33% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

139th of 586

220th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2022 January

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce RTX 3050 vs Arc A350M specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce RTX 3050 graphics card is better than the Arc A350M in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce RTX 3050 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce RTX 3050 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Arc A350M has a significantly lower TDP at 25 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 at 130 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3050 is better than the Arc A350M.