NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

918 points

0.99% slightly better overall score

909 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

21 FPS

24 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

14 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

12 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS

16 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

11 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce MX350 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

13872 points

20414 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

13882 points

22274 points

60% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

13618 points

19350 points

42% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

13257 points

22280 points

68% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

747 MHz

931 MHz

24% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

937 MHz

1011 MHz

7% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

1024 Bit

1500% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

56.06 GB/s

179.2 GB/s

219% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

20 W

224% significantly lower TDP

65 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

14.99 Gigapixels/s

32.35 Gigapixels/s

115% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

29.98 Gigatexels/s

80.88 Gigatexels/s

169% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.88 TFLOPS

2.59 TFLOPS

37% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

1280

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

150% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

269th of 586

270th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 February

2018 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

HBM2

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce MX350 beats the Radeon RX Vega M GL in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon RX Vega M GL has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Radeon RX Vega M GL also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the GeForce MX350 has a significantly lower TDP at 20 W when compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL at 65 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce MX350 is better than the Radeon RX Vega M GL.