GeForce MX250 vs RTX A500 Laptop comparison
For gaming, the RTX A500 Laptop graphics card is better than the GeForce MX250 in our tests.
In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the RTX A500 Laptop is better than the GeForce MX250.
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
GPU Comparison
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
Benchmark Score
Overall Score
General gaming and workstation score
194%
significantly better overall score
Flux Core frame rate
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
35 FPS
significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
Electron frame rate
Randomly generated noise sphere test
14 FPS
significantly higher Electron frame rate
City frame rate
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
24 FPS
significantly higher City frame rate
Clouds frame rate
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
10 FPS
significantly higher Clouds frame rate
Free GPU Benchmark
Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce MX250 and the RTX A500 Laptop? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
Other Benchmarks
Blender score
Cycles Render (Samples per minute)
677%
significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
OpenCL compute benchmark
339%
significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
Vulkan compute benchmark
307%
significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
Specifications
Core Clock Speed
Nominal chip frequency
12%
slightly higher core clock speed
Boost Clock Speed
Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met
48%
significantly higher boost clock speed
Memory Bus Width
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
Identical
Memory Bandwidth
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
99%
significantly higher memory bandwidth
Pixel Rate
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
196%
significantly higher pixel rate
Texture Rate
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
294%
significantly higher texture rate
Shading Units
Number of processors dedicated to shader processing
433%
significantly more shading units
Texture Mapping Units
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
166%
significantly more texture mapping units
Render Output Processors
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
100%
significantly more render output processors
Other details
Rank
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
302nd
of 586
216th
of 586
Release date
The official date of release of this chip
2019 February
2022 March
Memory Type
The type of memory used by this chip
GDDR5
GDDR6
DirectX Support
Maximum version of DirectX supported
12.0
12.0
OpenGL Support
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
4.6
4.6
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.