NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

640 points
200% significantly better overall score
213 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

14 FPS
9 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

10 FPS
7 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS
7 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

8 FPS
5 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce MX250 and the GeForce GT 730M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

89.74 points
136% significantly higher Blender score
37.93 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

9734 points
295% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
2459 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10197 points
196% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
3437 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

9939 points
228% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
3025 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

9326 points
185% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
3269 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

9178 points
160% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
3524 points

Specifications

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit
Identical
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

48.06 GB/s
233% significantly higher memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

10 W
230% significantly lower TDP
33 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

16.61 Gigapixels/s
188% significantly higher pixel rate
5.75 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

24.91 Gigatexels/s
8% slightly higher texture rate
23.01 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384
Identical
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

24
32
33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
100% significantly more render output processors
8

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

302nd of 586
425th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February
2014 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GT 730M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce MX250 GPU is faster than the GeForce GT 730M in gaming.

In addition, the GeForce MX250 has a significantly lower TDP at 10 W when compared to the GeForce GT 730M at 33 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce MX250 is faster than the GeForce GT 730M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons