NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 369.00
$ 159.21
$ 209.79 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2262 points
1254% significantly better overall score
167 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS
43 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

35 FPS
33 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

31 FPS
28 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

28 FPS
26 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 970 and the Quadro K1100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

289.94 points
772% significantly higher Blender score
33.22 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

25908 points
1074% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
2205 points
Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

13595 points
792% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score
1523 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

29153 points
1198% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
2245 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

34107 points
1180% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
2664 points
Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

13595 points
553% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score
2079 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

29277 points
854% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
3067 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

32348 points
1021% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
2884 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1050 MHz
46% significantly higher core clock speed
716 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
100% significantly more memory
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

224.4 GB/s
400% significantly higher memory bandwidth
44.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

145 W
45 W
222% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

65.97 Gigapixels/s
1068% significantly higher pixel rate
5.65 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

122.5 Gigatexels/s
442% significantly higher texture rate
22.59 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1664
333% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

104
224% significantly more texture mapping units
32

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

56
250% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

193rd of 586
453rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 September
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 970 vs Quadro K1100M comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 970 beats the Quadro K1100M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 970 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 970 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K1100M has a significantly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 970 at 145 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 970 is better than the Quadro K1100M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons