NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1001 points

1252 points

25% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

24 FPS

27 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

17 FPS

19 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS

17 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 965M and the Quadro M4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

1804 points

2302 points

27% slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

147.61 points

221.61 points

50% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

13861 points

16648 points

20% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16496 points

18372 points

11% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16483 points

20969 points

27% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

15820 points

20001 points

26% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16599 points

23838 points

43% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

944 MHz

18% slightly higher core clock speed

800 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

192.3 GB/s

139% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

100% significantly lower TDP

120 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36.8 Gigapixels/s

49.47 Gigapixels/s

34% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

73.6 Gigatexels/s

80.39 Gigatexels/s

9% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.36 TFLOPS

2.57 TFLOPS

9% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

1664

62% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

104

62% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

263rd of 586

247th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 January

2015 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.4

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro M4000 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro M4000 GPU is faster than the GeForce GTX 965M in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 965M has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro M4000 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 965M has a significantly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the Quadro M4000 at 120 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro M4000 is faster than the GeForce GTX 965M.