NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1001 points
1094 points
9% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

24 FPS
25 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

17 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate
16 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
15 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate
14 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 965M and the Quadro M3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

147.61 points
269.47 points
82% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

13861 points
15678 points
13% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16496 points
17348 points
5% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16483 points
17520 points
6% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

15820 points
16504 points
4% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16599 points
16744 points
0.87% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s
160.4 GB/s
100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W
25% slightly lower TDP
75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36.8 Gigapixels/s
9% slightly higher pixel rate
33.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

73.6 Gigatexels/s
9% slightly higher texture rate
67.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.36 TFLOPS
9% slightly better floating point performance
2.15 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
Identical
1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
Identical
64

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

263rd of 586
257th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 January
2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro M3000M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 965M GPU is faster than the Quadro M3000M in gaming.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 965M has a slightly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the Quadro M3000M at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 965M is faster than the Quadro M3000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons