NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1001 points

47% significantly better overall score

677 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

24 FPS

5 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

19 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

17 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

13 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

13 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

11 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 965M and the Quadro M2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

147.61 points

152.71 points

3% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

13861 points

8% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

12812 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16496 points

0.41% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

16429 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16483 points

5% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

15588 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

15820 points

16429 points

3% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16599 points

10% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

14964 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

944 MHz

1025 MHz

8% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

55 W

9% slightly lower TDP

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

263rd of 586

295th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro M2200 comparison

In our benchmarks, the Quadro M2200 beats the GeForce GTX 965M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro M2200 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro M2200 has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 965M at 60 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro M2200 is faster than the GeForce GTX 965M.