NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

593 points

695 points

17% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS

Identical

13 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

Identical

11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

9 FPS

10 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 960M and the Quadro K2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

139.59 points

10% slightly higher Blender score

125.93 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

11818 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

11549 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12257 points

1% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

12020 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10582 points

11238 points

6% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11578 points

1% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

11456 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

9535 points

10094 points

5% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1097 MHz

9% slightly higher core clock speed

1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1176 MHz

4% slightly higher boost clock speed

1124 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

Identical

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

65 W

4% slightly lower TDP

68 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

18.82 Gigapixels/s

4% slightly higher pixel rate

17.98 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

47.04 Gigatexels/s

4% slightly higher texture rate

44.96 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

Identical

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

309th of 586

292nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 March

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro K2200 benchmarks

For gaming, the Quadro K2200 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 960M in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 960M has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 960M also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 960M has a slightly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the Quadro K2200 at 68 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K2200 is faster than the GeForce GTX 960M.