Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 4 GB vs AMD FirePro D300, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?
Quickly search and compare graphics cards
General gaming and workstation score
Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes
Randomly generated noise sphere test
Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering
Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test
Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 960M and the FirePro D300? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.
OpenCL compute benchmark
Vulkan compute benchmark
OpenCL compute benchmark
Vulkan compute benchmark
Number of parallel lines to the memory chips
Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory
Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU
Number of pixels that can be rendered per second
Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second
Raw number of floating point operations per second
Number of processors dedicated to shader processing
Number of processors dedicated to applying textures
Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering
Ranking in the hardwareDB database
The official date of release of this chip
The type of memory used by this chip
Maximum version of DirectX supported
Maximum version of OpenGL supported
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 960M GPU is faster than the FirePro D300 in gaming.
In addition, the GeForce GTX 960M has a significantly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the FirePro D300 at 150 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.
In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 960M is better than the FirePro D300.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.