NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 265.00
$ 77.11
$ 187.89 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1419 points
798% significantly better overall score
158 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

29 FPS
25 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

22 FPS
19 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

20 FPS
17 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

17 FPS
16 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 960 and the Quadro 3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

21072 points
628% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
2894 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

19796 points
430% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
3731 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1127 MHz
150% significantly higher core clock speed
450 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
100% significantly more memory
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112.2 GB/s
40% slightly higher memory bandwidth
80 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W
75 W
60% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

37.7 Gigapixels/s
737% significantly higher pixel rate
4.5 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

75.39 Gigatexels/s
318% significantly higher texture rate
18 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
326% significantly more shading units
240

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
60% significantly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

239th of 586
466th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 January
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 960 vs Quadro 3000M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 960 GPU is faster than the Quadro 3000M in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 960 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 960 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro 3000M has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 960 at 120 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 960 is faster than the Quadro 3000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons