NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1029 points
2% slightly better overall score
1001 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

23 FPS
24 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

14 FPS
17 FPS
3 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS
16 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

12 FPS
15 FPS
3 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 760 and the GeForce GTX 965M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

1673 points
1804 points
7% slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

157.20 points
6% slightly higher Blender score
147.61 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

10683 points
13861 points
29% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

13578 points
16496 points
21% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12985 points
16483 points
26% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

14136 points
15820 points
11% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

14394 points
16599 points
15% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

980 MHz
3% slightly higher core clock speed
944 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1032 MHz
1150 MHz
11% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192.3 GB/s
139% significantly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

170 W
60 W
183% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

24.77 Gigapixels/s
36.8 Gigapixels/s
48% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

99.07 Gigatexels/s
34% slightly higher texture rate
73.6 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.38 TFLOPS
0.98% slightly better floating point performance
2.36 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1152
12% slightly more shading units
1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

96
49% significantly more texture mapping units
64

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

262nd of 586
263rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 November
2015 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 760 vs GeForce GTX 965M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 965M GPU is faster than the GeForce GTX 760 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 760 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the GeForce GTX 965M has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 965M has a significantly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 760 at 170 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 965M over the GeForce GTX 760.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons