NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 818.00

$ 149.46

$ 668.54 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

686 points

899 points

31% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

14 FPS

20 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS

13 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS

14 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and the Quadro K4200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

106.74 points

170.14 points

59% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

12510 points

39% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

8973 points

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

5182 points

5953 points

14% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12954 points

10% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

11745 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12372 points

8% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

11396 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12391 points

0.57% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

12321 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10764 points

12444 points

15% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz

30% slightly higher core clock speed

780 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1085 MHz

38% slightly higher boost clock speed

784 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

86.4 GB/s

172.8 GB/s

100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

75% significantly lower TDP

105 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.36 Gigapixels/s

21.95 Gigapixels/s

26% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

43.4 Gigatexels/s

87.81 Gigatexels/s

102% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.11 TFLOPS

0.05% slightly better floating point performance

2.11 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640

1344

110% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

180% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

293rd of 586

271st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 February

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro K4200 comparison

For gaming, the Quadro K4200 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the Quadro K4200 at 105 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro K4200 over the GeForce GTX 750 Ti.