NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 818.00
$ 2156.00 significantly less expensive
$ 2974.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

686 points
146% significantly better overall score
278 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

14 FPS
7 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS
8 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS
7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 750 Ti and the Quadro K3100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

106.74 points
26% slightly higher Blender score
84.13 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

12510 points
203% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
4121 points
Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

5182 points
70% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score
3037 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12954 points
268% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
3517 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12372 points
166% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
4645 points
Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

5182 points
38% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score
3739 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12391 points
98% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
6238 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10764 points
217% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
3389 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz
49% significantly higher core clock speed
680 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

86.4 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
18% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W
25% slightly lower TDP
75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.36 Gigapixels/s
53% significantly higher pixel rate
11.3 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

43.4 Gigatexels/s
45.18 Gigatexels/s
4% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

640
768
20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40
64
60% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
32
100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

293rd of 586
387th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 February
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro K3100M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti beats the Quadro K3100M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a slightly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the Quadro K3100M at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is faster than the Quadro K3100M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons