NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs Intel Arc A350M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6 GB vs Intel Arc A350M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3653 points

101% significantly better overall score

1817 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

82 FPS

35 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

47 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

49 FPS

17 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

32 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

60 FPS

29 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

31 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

37 FPS

16 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

21 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 and the Arc A350M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

722.48 points

91% significantly higher Blender score

377.40 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

55712 points

141% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

23107 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

59886 points

140% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

24875 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

56143 points

126% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

24781 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz

409% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1785 MHz

55% significantly higher boost clock speed

1150 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

200% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192.1 GB/s

71% significantly higher memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

25 W

380% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

85.68 Gigapixels/s

210% significantly higher pixel rate

27.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

157.1 Gigatexels/s

184% significantly higher texture rate

55.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.03 TFLOPS

184% significantly better floating point performance

1.77 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1408

83% significantly more shading units

768

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

83% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

134th of 599

224th of 599

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 March

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 vs Arc A350M comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 graphics card is better than the Arc A350M in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1660 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Arc A350M has a significantly lower TDP at 25 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 at 120 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1660 is faster than the Arc A350M.