NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 6 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3236 points

2% slightly better overall score

3162 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

70 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

46 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

54 FPS

60 FPS

6 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

34 FPS

7 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

27 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the Radeon Pro W5700? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

756.05 points

854.68 points

13% slightly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

54310 points

71710 points

32% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

48658 points

49341 points

1% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56770 points

70784 points

24% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54216 points

72396 points

33% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1140 MHz

1400 MHz

22% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1335 MHz

1880 MHz

40% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

448 GB/s

55% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

241% significantly lower TDP

205 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

64.08 Gigapixels/s

120.3 Gigapixels/s

87% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

128.2 Gigatexels/s

270.7 Gigatexels/s

111% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.10 TFLOPS

8.89 TFLOPS

116% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

2304

49% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

144

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

33% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

145th of 586

150th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2019 November

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W5700 comparison

For gaming, the Radeon Pro W5700 graphics card is better than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q in our tests.

Our database shows that the Radeon Pro W5700 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Radeon Pro W5700 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the Radeon Pro W5700 at 205 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon Pro W5700 is better than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q.