NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Intel Arc A380

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 6 GB vs Intel Arc A380, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Intel Arc A380

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3236 points

6% slightly better overall score

3050 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS

9 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

65 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

46 FPS

47 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

54 FPS

6 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

47 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

34 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

29 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the Arc A380? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

4964 points

515% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

806 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

756.05 points

63% significantly higher Blender score

461.06 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56770 points

48% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

38350 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54216 points

47% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

36712 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1140 MHz

280% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1335 MHz

2000 MHz

49% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

96 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

54% significantly higher memory bandwidth

186 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

25% slightly lower TDP

75 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

64.08 Gigapixels/s

0.12% slightly higher pixel rate

64 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

128.2 Gigatexels/s

0.16% slightly higher texture rate

128 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.10 TFLOPS

0.12% slightly better floating point performance

4.10 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

49% significantly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

144th of 586

153rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2022 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A380 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GPU is faster than the Arc A380 in gaming.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Arc A380 has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a slightly lower TDP at 60 W when compared to the Arc A380 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q over the Arc A380.