NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Intel Arc A350M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 6 GB vs Intel Arc A350M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Intel Arc A350M

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3236 points

78% significantly better overall score

1817 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

73 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

47 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

46 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

32 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

54 FPS

23 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

31 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

34 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

21 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the Arc A350M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

756.05 points

100% significantly higher Blender score

377.40 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

54310 points

135% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

23107 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

56770 points

128% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

24875 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

54216 points

118% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

24781 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1140 MHz

280% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1335 MHz

16% slightly higher boost clock speed

1150 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

200% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

157% significantly higher memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

25 W

139% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

64.08 Gigapixels/s

132% significantly higher pixel rate

27.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

128.2 Gigatexels/s

132% significantly higher texture rate

55.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

4.10 TFLOPS

132% significantly better floating point performance

1.77 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

100% significantly more shading units

768

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

144th of 586

220th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A350M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q beats the Arc A350M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Arc A350M has a significantly lower TDP at 25 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q at 60 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q over the Arc A350M.