NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 350, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 191.88
$ 39.98
$ 151.90 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3755 points
1164% significantly better overall score
297 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

84 FPS
77 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

50 FPS
45 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

61 FPS
54 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
6 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

38 FPS
36 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and the Radeon R7 350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

60772 points
454% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
10951 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

55624 points
475% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
9660 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

64068 points
572% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
9524 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

60513 points
658% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
7976 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz
53% significantly higher core clock speed
1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1785 MHz
69% significantly higher boost clock speed
1050 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

336 GB/s
366% significantly higher memory bandwidth
72 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

125 W
55 W
127% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

85.68 Gigapixels/s
569% significantly higher pixel rate
12.8 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

157.1 Gigatexels/s
513% significantly higher texture rate
25.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1408
175% significantly more shading units
512

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

88
175% significantly more texture mapping units
32

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48
200% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

130th of 586
377th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 October
2016 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon R7 350 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER graphics card is better than the Radeon R7 350 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Radeon R7 350 has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER at 125 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is better than the Radeon R7 350.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons