NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Intel Iris Pro 5200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6 GB vs Intel Iris Pro 5200, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3755 points

1929% significantly better overall score

185 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

84 FPS

79 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

50 FPS

47 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

61 FPS

58 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

38 FPS

35 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

2 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and the Iris Pro 5200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

60772 points

1090% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5106 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

64068 points

1205% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4909 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

60513 points

1496% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

3791 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1530 MHz

665% significantly higher core clock speed

200 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1785 MHz

55% significantly higher boost clock speed

1150 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

125 W

45 W

177% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

85.68 Gigapixels/s

1762% significantly higher pixel rate

4.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

157.1 Gigatexels/s

241% significantly higher texture rate

46 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1408

339% significantly more shading units

320

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

120% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

1100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

129th of 586

440th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 October

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.3

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Iris Pro 5200 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER graphics card is better than the Iris Pro 5200 in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Iris Pro 5200 has a significantly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER at 125 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is better than the Iris Pro 5200.