NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

146% significantly better overall score

909 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

29 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

24 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

12 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

16 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

87% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

20414 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

61% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

22274 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

105% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

19350 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

68% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

22280 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

59% significantly higher core clock speed

931 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

64% significantly higher boost clock speed

1011 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

1024 Bit

700% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

179.2 GB/s

39% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

65 W

15% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

64% significantly higher pixel rate

32.35 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

15% slightly higher texture rate

80.88 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS

15% slightly better floating point performance

2.59 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

1280

42% many more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

42% many more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

270th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2018 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

HBM2

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 GPU is faster than the Radeon RX Vega M GL in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Radeon RX Vega M GL has a slightly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Radeon RX Vega M GL.