NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 260X 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points
188% significantly better overall score
779 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS
34 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
19 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS
19 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
11 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS
20 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
16 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS
16 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
6 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Radeon R7 260X? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3627 points
141% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
1500 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz
35% slightly higher core clock speed
1100 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz
66% significantly higher boost clock speed
1000 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
100% significantly more memory
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s
23% slightly higher memory bandwidth
104 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
53% significantly lower TDP
115 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s
202% significantly higher pixel rate
17.6 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s
51% significantly higher texture rate
61.6 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS
51% significantly better floating point performance
1.97 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896
Identical
896

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

56
Identical
56

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
100% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586
284th of 586

Family

The product line

-
Radeon R7 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.4

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R7 260X comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is better than the Radeon R7 260X in our tests.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

As stated by the manufacturer, the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Radeon R7 260X at 115 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Radeon R7 260X.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons