NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs AMD Radeon R5 M330 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

1112% significantly better overall score

185 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

48 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

33 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

21 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Radeon R5 M330? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

605% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5430 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

620% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4983 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

581% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

5844 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

720% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4573 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

55% significantly higher core clock speed

955 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

61% significantly higher boost clock speed

1030 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

789% significantly higher memory bandwidth

14.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

18 W

316% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

546% significantly higher pixel rate

8.24 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

352% significantly higher texture rate

20.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

180% significantly more shading units

320

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

180% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

439th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R5 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2015 May

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.3

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R5 M330 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is better than the Radeon R5 M330 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Radeon R5 M330 has a significantly lower TDP at 18 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Radeon R5 M330.