NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99

$ 82.02

$ 167.97 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

414% significantly better overall score

436 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

42 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

10 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

24 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

6 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

28 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

244% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

11128 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

227% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

10972 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

286% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

10310 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

211% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

12066 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

60% significantly higher core clock speed

925 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

36% slightly higher boost clock speed

1219 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

166% significantly higher memory bandwidth

48 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

35 W

114% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

173% significantly higher pixel rate

19.5 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

139% significantly higher texture rate

39.01 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS

138% significantly better floating point performance

1.25 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

75% significantly more shading units

512

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

346th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2017 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 GPU is faster than the Radeon Pro WX 2100 in gaming.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 over the Radeon Pro WX 2100.