NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 6 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99

$ 2582.01 significantly less expensive

$ 2832.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

11% slightly better overall score

2012 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

52 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

Identical

30 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

7 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

30 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

19 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Quadro RTX 3000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points

1534.25 points

244% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points

70456 points

75% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

61102 points

59% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

54040 points

50% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

62696 points

57% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

58257 points

55% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

57% significantly higher core clock speed

945 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

6 GiB

49% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

6% slightly lower TDP

80 W

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

208th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro RTX 3000 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 GPU is faster than the Quadro RTX 3000 in gaming.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a slightly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro RTX 3000 at 80 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 over the Quadro RTX 3000.