NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99

$ 134.75

$ 115.24 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

79% significantly better overall score

1252 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

26 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

27 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

12 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

19 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

17 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

15 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Quadro M4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

3627 points

57% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

2302 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points

100% significantly higher Blender score

221.61 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points

141% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

16648 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

108% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

18372 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

71% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

20969 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

99% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

20001 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

57% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

23838 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

85% significantly higher core clock speed

800 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

192.3 GB/s

50% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

60% significantly lower TDP

120 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

7% slightly higher pixel rate

49.47 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

15% slightly higher texture rate

80.39 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.98 TFLOPS

15% slightly better floating point performance

2.57 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

1664

85% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

104

85% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

247th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2015 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.4

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro M4000 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is better than the Quadro M4000 in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro M4000 has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro M4000 at 120 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Quadro M4000.