NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99
$ 125.86
$ 124.13 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points
231% significantly better overall score
677 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS
34 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
19 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS
18 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
13 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS
24 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
13 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS
12 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
11 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Quadro M2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points
191% significantly higher Blender score
152.71 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points
214% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
12812 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points
133% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
16429 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points
130% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
15588 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points
142% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
16429 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points
150% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
14964 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz
44% significantly higher core clock speed
1025 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
Identical
4 GiB

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
55 W
36% slightly lower TDP

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586
295th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
-

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro M2200 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1650 GPU is faster than the Quadro M2200 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro M2200 has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Quadro M2200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons