NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 249.99

$ 136.96

$ 113.03 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2244 points

797% significantly better overall score

250 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

53 FPS

47 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

30 FPS

27 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

37 FPS

33 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

23 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Quadro K2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

445.31 points

901% significantly higher Blender score

44.49 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

40258 points

1217% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

3055 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38315 points

841% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35907 points

867% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

3710 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39842 points

878% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

4071 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

37542 points

809% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4126 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1485 MHz

55% significantly higher core clock speed

954 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

128.1 GB/s

100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

64 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

51 W

47% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53.28 Gigapixels/s

598% significantly higher pixel rate

7.63 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93.24 Gigatexels/s

205% significantly higher texture rate

30.53 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896

133% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

194th of 586

401st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 April

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro K2000 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1650 beats the Quadro K2000 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro K2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Quadro K2000.