NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Iris Xe

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4 GB vs Intel Iris Xe, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

36 %
100% significantly better overall score
18 %

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

46 FPS
23 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
24 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS
14 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
15 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

34 FPS
18 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
16 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS
11 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
11 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 and the Iris Xe? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

38,315
170% significantly higher Geekbench (OpenCL) score
14,184

Geekbench (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

35,907
154% significantly higher Geekbench (Vulkan) score
14,105

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1,485 MHz
395% significantly higher core clock speed
300 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1,665 MHz
51% significantly higher boost clock speed
1,100 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
15 W
400% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

53 Gigapixels/s
303% significantly higher pixel rate
13 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

93 Gigatexels/s
253% significantly higher texture rate
26 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3 TFLOPS
8 TFLOPS
183% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896
133% significantly more shading units
384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

56
133% significantly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
166% significantly more render output processors
12

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

103rd of 526
184th of 526

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

April 2019
September 2020

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
-

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Iris Xe comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 graphics card is better than the Iris Xe in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Iris Xe has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 at 75 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1650 is faster than the Iris Xe.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons